Archive
Mining Week 6/’13: Government actions in South Africa and Argentina
Top Stories:
- Anglo and government clash in South Africa
- Anglo announces mine closures resulting in thousands of job losses in its South African operations. In response the president threatened to review Anglo’s mining licenses, trying to force the company to keep the mines open. Mark Cutifani, Anglo’s new CEO, reacted with fierce criticism of the government’s attitude.
- Mining companies in South Africa see a shift of union membership from the moderate NUM to the more radical Amcu, leading up to further wage negotiations this year.
- Sources: Financial Times; Reuters; Financial Times 2
- Vale and government clash in Argentina
- Vale’s $6bln Rio Colorado potash project in the Mendoza project of Argentina is rumored to be delayed by up to 3 years, mainly driven by large rail investments. Vale announced it is reviewing the project economics and has therefore extended the holiday of the workers, but the company denies the project has been suspended.
- The governor of the province told media that Vale has asked for delay of a sales tax implementation from construction to extraction phase, and argues that this would imply a tax break of $1.5-2.0bln. He also stressed that the government will make sure the project moves forward irrespective of Vale’s plans.
- Sources: Vale press release; Financial Times; Mineweb
Trends & Implications:
- The business environment for mining in South Africa remains very unstable. Not only the government’s ambition to get as much revenue out of mining as possible, resulting in top decile effective taxes, but also the radical approach of unions fighting to increase membership levels, create a situation in which long-term planning for any mining company in the country is almost impossible.
- The business environment in Argentina has deteriorated quickly and appears to move into the direction of nationalization of business quickly. The government tries to get projects going in an attempt to stimulate the economy, but at the same time makes it impossible for companies to repatriate profits from those projects in an attempt to limit inflation. As a result there is no incentive for any foreign company to invest in the country for any short to mid-term gains. In the Rio Colorado case: A delay of the effect of sales tax to the extraction phase is unlikely to reduce tax paid by Vale by $1.5bln, as the company only starts selling its product in large quantities in that extraction phase.
2013 | Wilfred Visser | thebusinessofmining.com
Mining Week 42/’12: South Africa strikes; Glenstrate voting scheme
Top Stories of the Week:
- South African strikes spread; workers fired
- Illegal (wildcat) strikes in South Africa have spread to more or less all major miners in the country. Anglo American’s Kumba iron ore and platinum operations are faced with production disruptions, as are Xstrata, GoldFields, Anglogold, and most other major mining houses in the country.
- South African strikes escalated when police shot down Lonmin strikers. After Lonmin agreed to a 22% wage increase workers in other companies demanded similar increases, bypassing the traditional unions. Several companies are trying to set up structured wage discussions to come to a collective agreement.
- AngloAmerican’s Amplats decided to fire 12 thousand striking workers, which is a fifth of its total workforce.
- Sources: Anglo American press releases1 2; Financial Times 2; wall Street Journal
- Xstrata board recommends Glenstrata deal and complicates voting
- Xstrata’s board of directors issues advice for the company shareholders to accept the merger proposal to form Glenstrata. The voting structure has been set up to assess support for a deal both with and without an extensive retention package for Xstrata’s top management.
- Shareholders will vote first on the merger proposal both including and excluding the retention package, requiring a 75% majority excluding Glencore’s votes. Then the vote on the retention package will be done separately, requiring only a 50% majority of votes.
- Sources: BusinessWeek; Financial Times
Trends & Implications:
- The voting scheme is set up by Xstrata’s board to have a safety net for the deal in case the shareholders don’t accept the management retention package. The Qatari sovereign wealth fund is the largest shareholder that can vote on the merger deal; it has not voiced its opinion on the improved Glencore offer and on the management incentives, but insiders indicate the group considers retention of Xstrata’s officers a key priority. Key unknown in the voting mechanism is whether or not the results of the first two questions (on the merger) are made public before the 3rd vote on the retention scheme.
- The unrest in South Africa is much wider than the mining industry, and as such requires solutions that are much broader than the industry. In the short term a large part of the workers might return to work with a significant increase in wages as demonstrated in the Lonmin case. However, as long as this increase does not span across the industry the workers that have not been given a raise will turn to strikes to stress their demands. The mining houses will have to work nationwide to find a sustainable solution for the industry, which is hard because South African miners operate on the high end of the global cost structure for many commodities. The task is even harder when taking in account that social unrest will continue as long as the issues in related and supplying industries continue.
2012 | Wilfred Visser | thebusinessofmining.com
Mining Week 34/’12: Lonmin labor dispute turns deadly
Top Stories of the Week:
- Fights between police and striking Lonmin workers results in over 40 deaths
- Over 40 miners and several police officers were killed in clashes with the police at Lonmin’s Marikana mine in South Africa, where workers had been on strike for about a week demanding wage increases.
- Competing trade unions trying to ‘control’ the workforce are mentioned as part of the reason the conflicts turned into strikes and violence.
- On August 16th, in the midst of the developments around the violence in South Africa, Lonmin’s CEO was diagnosed with serious illness and is temporarily replaced by the chairman of the board.
- Sources: Lonmin press release; Mining Weekly; Wall Street Journal
- Anglo American finalizes acquisition of 40% stake in De Beers
- Anglo American paid $5.1bln for the 40% stake of De Beers previously owned by the Oppenheimer family. The company now owns 85% of the major diamond producer.
- The deal was announced announced in November of last year; diamond prices have dropped significantly since that announcement.
- Sources: Anglo press release; Financial Times
Trends & Implications:
- The global platinum market is facing significant oversupply, keeping prices low and pushing platinum miners into the red. Lonmin is the highest cost producer among the major producers, putting it in a position in which is can’t keep workers satisfied without pay raises while it can not raise wages without making big losses. Anglo Platinum currently controls approx. 40% of global production in mines in South Africa and Zimbabwe. Various other miners have called on Anglo to cut production to make prices rise.
- The social and political situation in South Africa is causing most international mining companies without strong ties to the country to think twice before investing in the country: high tax rates, active and unpredictable unions, political leaders calling for mine nationalization, and the startup of a ‘national mining company’ result in a very high country risk level.
©2012 | Wilfred Visser | thebusinessofmining.com
Mining Week 51/’11: Grasberg back in business
Top Stories of the Week:
- Freeport McMoran strikes deal on Grasberg
- Freeport reached a two year extension of the collective labor agreement at its Indonesian Grasberg mine after a 3-month strike. The new agreement holds a 40% wage increase over 2 years, improved benefits, and the promise to base wage future negotiations on cost of living and competitor benchmarks.
- Only days after the announcement of the agreement a helicopter transporting Freeport’s workers was shot at close to the mine, wounding one person.
- Sources: Freeport McMoran press release; Wall Street Journal; Financial Times
- Further coal consolidation in Australia
- Less than a year after being put up for sale and then declining all offers made Whitehaven teamed up with Aston Resources to create the largest listed coal mining company in Australia with $5.1bln market value. The deal is structured as a shares only acquisition of Aston by Whitehaven.
- Sources: Financial Times; Whitehaven merger documentation
- Anglo reassured in South African court
- The South African court ruled that the department of mines had no right to grant the mining rights of Sishen iron ore mine in the country to a junior mining company with strong ties to some influential politicians, but that instead the Kumba Iron Ore holds the rights to the mine. Kumba is majority owned by Anglo American.
- Sources: Anglo American press release; Financial Times; Wall Street Journal
Trends & Implications:
- The coal mining industry in Australia is still relatively fragmented, with both the diversified supermajors and many domestic listed and unlisted companies active in the industry. Because the mining districts are much less concentrated than the iron ore or gold districts of the country it is harder to achieve economies of scale that would justify many mergers. The deals taken place are mainly based on transportation and sales negotiation synergies.
- The Wall Street Journal published a good, readable, article this week describing the developments in the mining industry, signaling the combination of two key drivers this year: declining prices, and increasing costs. The resulting low margins will move the focus of many mining companies in the coming years to cost control. However, the winners of this cycle will be the companies that manage to invest during this period with lower profits to build capacity that will make them benefit from the structural increase in prices that will be caused by the structural price increases in the industry. Clearly not all cost increases are structural: equipment and contractor scarcity is mainly a temporary result of an overheated industry; but cost increases resulting from the move to harder forms of mining will stick.
©2011 | Wilfred Visser | thebusinessofmining.com
Anglo chief plays down acquisition talk
“Cynthia Carroll, chief executive of Anglo American, has downplayed speculation that the multinational miner is on the hunt for acquisitions, saying that bid prices in the mining sector have been ‘too high’ for the company to enter the fray. ‘We are always looking at possible combinations across the sector and always evaluating whether it’s a better business case to build our own projects or look at acquisition opportunities,’ said Cynthia Carroll. But she added that ‘prices are still too high’, basing her comments on recent bids and takeovers. In recent months, Anglo has been linked to a bid for Riversdale Mining, an Mozambique-focused coal miner that was ultimately bought by Rio Tinto for A$4bn. More recently, it considered a possible bid for Macarthur Coal, an Australian coal miner. Macarthur has since accepted a joint A$4.9bn ($5.2bn) bid from a consortium led by Peabody of the US. The bid values the Macarthur at 18 times estimated 2012 earnings.”
Observations:
- Anglo American has not made any large acquisitions since 2008, when it bought several iron ore assets in Brazil. Of the 5 large diversified miners the company has been least active in large scale M&A over the past 10 years, as depicted below (click on image for larger version).
Implications:
- If the acquisitions would be paid in shares, the current low share prices would hinder acquisitions (large dilution of ownership). However, with the current large operating profits acquisitions are mainly paid in cash.
- Valuation of companies is done in various ways, based on standalone company value and additional financial and operational synergies of a change of control, all leading to different results: a ‘true value’ of a company can never be determined, as the value differs per acquirer and valuation assumptions are debatable. However, the fact that various companies are acquiring targets in Southern Africa which would have a better operational match with Anglo American (= higher synergies) implies that Anglo is more conservative in its valuation, being cautious to overpay.
©2011 | Wilfred Visser | thebusinessofmining.com
Vale drops $1.1bn bid to purchase Metorex
“Brazil’s Vale has dropped its $1.1bn offer for Metorex, a central African copper and cobalt miner, clearing the way for China’s Jinchuan Group to complete a $1.4bn takeover that would establish the state-owned miner in risky frontier markets for metals. The move came a week after Jinchuan, one of China’s largest mining companies, disrupted its Brazilian rival’s plans by offering R8.90 per share for Metorex. Metorex, however, has not yet recommended Jinchuan’s higher offer to shareholders. Its board will “convene shortly to consider its position with respect to the Vale offer and the Jinchuan offer”, the South Africa-based miner said. ‘Africa is a key focus for our company,’ a Jinchuan executive told the Financial Times. He said it aimed to expand production of copper and cobalt, two industrial metals with rising demand being driven by Chinese consumption.” Source: Financial Times, July 11 2011
Observations:
- Metorex is a South African copper and cobalt miner with operations in Zambia and Congo. The company’s board has recommended the shareholders to accept Jinchuan’s offer, paving the way for the takeover of the company. Vale withdrew its inferior bid quoting capital allocation rigor as the reason for not doing a higher bid.
- Jinchuan is a government owned non-ferrous metals miner. The company has been rumoured to plan an IPO for many years. End of 2010 the company announced a small acquisition in South African platinum mining and furthermore the company bought a Canadian developer of a mine in Tibet.
Implications:
- The acquisition by Jinchuan is an example of Chinese company’s high willingness to pay for foreign assets. The project is certainly not worth more to Jinchuan than to Vale, which owns assets nearby which could cause synergies. However, Chinese companies are willing to pay a high premium to grow internationally, positioning themselves as state champion in a consolidating industry.
©2011 | Wilfred Visser | thebusinessofmining.com
Lex: Nationalisation of South African mines
“Calls for the nationalisation of South Africa’s mines by Julius Malema, recently re-elected leader of the ruling African National Congress’s Youth League, are raising concerns in the industry. Lex’s Edward Hadas and Richard Stovin-Bradford discuss the threat, and whether mine nationalisation is good for the nation.” Source: FT: Lex – video, June 29 2011
Observations:
- Julius Malema, a leader of the Youth League of the ANC, has been calling for nationalisation of South African mines to increase control over resources and make the country benefit more from the earth’s riches.
- Though not set up to facilitate nationalisation, this year’s launch of a state mining company (AEMFC) is seen by many industry experts as a threat to a free mining market in the country.
Implications:
- An internal power struggle in the ANC party could take long before any moves for nationalization would be taken. However, due to the long horizon of mining projects investors will certainly take this risk in account when looking at South African opportunities.
- A potential compromise demanded by the ANC to satisfy the demands for more mining benefits for the South African people would be a royalty or tax increase. This would prevent a take-over of control of mining assets by inexperienced and overloaded government institutions, while transferring a larger portion of mining profits to the population.
©2011 | Wilfred Visser | thebusinessofmining.com
Lonmin to invest $2bln to boost production
“Lonmin, one of three South African companies that mine most of the world’s platinum, plans to invest $2bn to restore its production to historic levels of about 1m ounces a year by 2015. In the six months to March, the London-listed miner raised earnings from a low base. Pre-tax profit doubled to $159m despite bigger pay packages for workers, rising electricity costs and the stronger rand which has been eating away at many South African miners’ profits. Lonmin’s output has declined steadily over recent years, with the miner selling 706,000 ounces of platinum in its year to September compared to over 900,000 ounces in 2004 and 2005.” Source: Financial Times, May 10 2011
Observations:
- Lonmin currently depends on the Marikana mine for its entire production. The production increase to 2015 should come from this mine. The Limpopo mine currently is under care and maintenance, while the most company’s most promising growth opportunity is the Akanani deposit with just over 10 Moz platinum reserves. Global platinum production is concentrated in South Africa’s Bushveld complex and Russia’s Norilsk region, while demand mainly comes from car manufacturers in Asia and North America.
- Lonmin is suffering from quickly increasing employment costs (8% increase over the year) and electricity costs (24% increase). Furthermore the appreciation of the South African rand makes costs increase while revenues (in dollars) are not equally increasing.

Implications:
- Foreign exchange cost pressures are hurting miners with operations in both developing countries and developed countries in which currencies are not linked to the dollar when the dollar is weakening. With an increasing portion of production shifting to developing countries with high inflation rates exchange rates are becoming more and more important for business evaluation.
- Several large diversified miners are hesitant to take a stronger position in platinum because of safety issues. Most existing projects have poor safety track records, making acquisition of producing assets a CSR-risk, while development of new projects would require significant capital expenditure and result in long lead times.
©2011 | Wilfred Visser | thebusinessofmining.com





