Home
> Market change > Breaking down BHP Billiton’s iron ore production costs
Breaking down BHP Billiton’s iron ore production costs
September 29, 2011
businessmining
BHP Billiton organized a site tour of its Western Australia Iron Ore operations this week, providing valuable information about its production costs:
Source: BHP Billiton Site Tour Presentation, September 27 2011
Observations:
- BHP positions itself in the cost curve around $39/t CIF. Average iron ore price for the year ended June 2011 was $163/t, resulting in a 76% operating margin.
Implications:
- Combining the data from the two charts above, BHP’s breakdown of total iron ore costs of $39/t CIF China are as follows:
- US$9.4/t – Contractors
- US$7.0/t – Secondary taxes & royalties
- US$4.3/t – Freight, distribution & demurrage
- US$3.5/t – Depreciation, depletion & amortization
- US$3.1/t – Fuel & energy
- US$2.7/t – Raw materials & consumables
- US$2.7/t – Labor incl. consultants
- US$0.4/t – Exploration
- US$5.9/t – Other
©2011 | Wilfred Visser | thebusinessofmining.com
Categories: Market change
Tags: BHP Billiton, business, China, CIF, consultants, consumables, contractors, costs, DD&A, exploration, freight, fuel, iron ore, labor, mining, mining business, Pilbara, price, taxes
Comments are closed.
Top Mining Industry Blogs
The Business of Mining was selected among the world's top 9 mining industry blogs by Mining IQ.
Top Posts
Tags
acquisition
Africa
aluminium
Anglo American
ArcelorMittal
Australia
Barrick
BHP Billiton
Brazil
Bumi
business
Canada
cash
CEO
China
Chinalco
coal
Coal India
Codelco
coking coal
copper
De Beers
debt
demand
diamonds
dividend
ENRC
fertilizer
Freeport-McMoran
Glencore
GlenStrata
gold
government
Guinea
India
Indonesia
investment
IPO
iron ore
Ivanhoe
Macarthur
merger
mining
mining business
Mongolia
nickel
Oyu Tolgoi
Peabody
Pilbara
platinum
potash
PotashCorp
price
pricing
profit
Queensland
Rio Tinto
Russia
shareholders
Simandou
South Africa
steel
strike
supply
takeover
tax
thermal coal
trading
uranium
USA
Vale
Vallar
Vedanta
Xstrata
zinc
Recent posts
Categories
- Business of Mining Specials (20)
- Corporate Social Responsibility (26)
- Financial reports (47)
- Investments (43)
- Market change (127)
- Mergers & Acquisitions (68)
- Mining Week (50)
Do you know who is the player with the best cost position on the curve (to the left of BHP)? Would that be Rio Tinto or Vale? Thank you
Based upon size and cost I think the lowest cost player is the combination of Rio Tinto’s iron ore operation in Western Australia. Rio Tinto operates as slightly lower cost than BHP Billiton.