Mining Week 37/’12: Glencore increases bid to take over Xstrata
September 8, 2012 businessmining
Top Story of the Week: Glencore takes Xstrata bid hostile
- Hours before Xstrata’s shareholders were to vote on the proposed merger of equals, Glencore announced it would make a higher bid on different terms . If the vote would have gone on the Qatari sovereign wealth fund would most likely have blocked a deal.
- The new bid offers 3.05 shares of Glencore for each share of Xstrata, 9% up from the previous bid at 2.80x. In response to the bid Xstrata’s share price went up 8.6% on Friday, with Glencore’s share price dropping 2.9%.
- Key changes to the previous bid are:
- The ‘merger of equals’ will likely change to a plain takeover. As a Xstrata’s shareholders can simply tender their shares and Glencore gains control as soon as it gains a majority of shares (up from the current 35%). Under the former proposed deal approx. two-thirds of Xstrata’s shareholders excluding Glencore would have to vote in favor of a deal.
- The initially proposed governance structure with Xstrata’s CEO Mick Davis as the new CEO of the combined company is scrapped and Glencore’s CEO Ivan Glasenberg will take the helm of the new company.
Trends & Implications:
- Facing the likely rejection of the merger bid Glencore had little to lose in changing the terms for the offer. The likelihood of a takeover offer being accepted is much higher than the stakes the merger was going to happen on the proposed terms. Xstrata’s shareholders know that their changes of getting an even better deal than what is offered now are very slim and that they face an immediate drop in Xstrata’s share price if Glencore doesn’t gain control.
- The offer values Xstrata roughly $4bn higher, but as the company holds 35% of Xstrata already it would cost Glencore approx. $2-3bn extra. If the deal was canceled Xstrata’s share price was likely to lose the roughly 10% in value resulting from Glencore’s bid, amounting to a loss of $1-2bn for Glencore.
- The sudden governance change to try to make Ivan Glasenberg CEO of the new company is hard to understand. The merger setup was criticized earlier because of the strong focus on keeping Xstrata’s executives on board with generous retention bonuses. Either Glencore’s leadership never really believed they will not be able to achieve the same results as Xstrata’s leadership or they will keep most of the retention controls in place in the new offer.
2012 | Wilfred Visser | thebusinessofmining.com
Top Mining Industry Blogs
The Business of Mining was selected among the world's top 9 mining industry blogs by Mining IQ.
- Recycling & the Future of Mining
- Capital Structure after the Crisis
- Technological Risk in Mining: Biotech replacing Potash?
- Minesourcing: How could crowdsourcing be used in mining?
- Mining impact of Japan's earthquake
- Vale acquires Simandou iron ore assets
- Vertical integration in mining: the trader's value chain
- BHP faces potash cartel backlash
acquisition Africa aluminium Anglo American ArcelorMittal Australia Barrick BHP Billiton Brazil Bumi business Canada cash CEO China Chinalco coal Coal India Codelco coking coal copper De Beers debt demand diamonds dividend ENRC fertilizer Freeport-McMoran Glencore GlenStrata gold government Guinea India Indonesia investment IPO iron ore Ivanhoe Macarthur merger mining mining business Mongolia nickel Oyu Tolgoi Peabody Pilbara platinum potash PotashCorp price pricing profit Queensland Rio Tinto Russia shareholders Simandou South Africa steel strike supply takeover tax thermal coal trading uranium USA Vale Vallar Vedanta Xstrata zinc