Home
> Mining Week > Mining Week 37/’12: Glencore increases bid to take over Xstrata
Mining Week 37/’12: Glencore increases bid to take over Xstrata
September 8, 2012
businessmining
Top Story of the Week: Glencore takes Xstrata bid hostile
- Hours before Xstrata’s shareholders were to vote on the proposed merger of equals, Glencore announced it would make a higher bid on different terms . If the vote would have gone on the Qatari sovereign wealth fund would most likely have blocked a deal.
- The new bid offers 3.05 shares of Glencore for each share of Xstrata, 9% up from the previous bid at 2.80x. In response to the bid Xstrata’s share price went up 8.6% on Friday, with Glencore’s share price dropping 2.9%.
- Key changes to the previous bid are:
- The ‘merger of equals’ will likely change to a plain takeover. As a Xstrata’s shareholders can simply tender their shares and Glencore gains control as soon as it gains a majority of shares (up from the current 35%). Under the former proposed deal approx. two-thirds of Xstrata’s shareholders excluding Glencore would have to vote in favor of a deal.
- The initially proposed governance structure with Xstrata’s CEO Mick Davis as the new CEO of the combined company is scrapped and Glencore’s CEO Ivan Glasenberg will take the helm of the new company.
- The exact details of the new structure are not yet known, as Glencore is yet to submit the new bid. The implications for the position and potential retention packages for Xstrata’s current top managers and the name of the new company will become clear when the new bid is published.
- Sources: Financial Times 1 2 3; Wall Street Journal 1 2 3; Reuters; BusinessWeek
Trends & Implications:
- Facing the likely rejection of the merger bid Glencore had little to lose in changing the terms for the offer. The likelihood of a takeover offer being accepted is much higher than the stakes the merger was going to happen on the proposed terms. Xstrata’s shareholders know that their changes of getting an even better deal than what is offered now are very slim and that they face an immediate drop in Xstrata’s share price if Glencore doesn’t gain control.
- The offer values Xstrata roughly $4bn higher, but as the company holds 35% of Xstrata already it would cost Glencore approx. $2-3bn extra. If the deal was canceled Xstrata’s share price was likely to lose the roughly 10% in value resulting from Glencore’s bid, amounting to a loss of $1-2bn for Glencore.
- The sudden governance change to try to make Ivan Glasenberg CEO of the new company is hard to understand. The merger setup was criticized earlier because of the strong focus on keeping Xstrata’s executives on board with generous retention bonuses. Either Glencore’s leadership never really believed they will not be able to achieve the same results as Xstrata’s leadership or they will keep most of the retention controls in place in the new offer.
2012 | Wilfred Visser | thebusinessofmining.com
Advertisements
Categories: Mining Week
Tags: business, CEO, directors, Glasenberg, Glencore, GlenStrata, merger, Mick Davis, mining, mining business, offer, share ratio, shareholders, takeover, Xstrata
Top Mining Industry Blogs
The Business of Mining was selected among the world's top 9 mining industry blogs by Mining IQ.
Top Posts
Tags
acquisition
Africa
aluminium
Anglo American
ArcelorMittal
Australia
Barrick
BHP Billiton
Brazil
Bumi
business
Canada
cash
CEO
China
Chinalco
coal
Coal India
Codelco
coking coal
copper
De Beers
debt
demand
diamonds
dividend
ENRC
fertilizer
Freeport-McMoran
Glencore
GlenStrata
gold
government
Guinea
India
Indonesia
investment
IPO
iron ore
Ivanhoe
Macarthur
merger
mining
mining business
Mongolia
nickel
Oyu Tolgoi
Peabody
Pilbara
platinum
potash
PotashCorp
price
pricing
profit
Queensland
Rio Tinto
Russia
shareholders
Simandou
South Africa
steel
strike
supply
takeover
tax
thermal coal
trading
uranium
USA
Vale
Vallar
Vedanta
Xstrata
zinc
Recent posts
Categories
- Business of Mining Specials (20)
- Corporate Social Responsibility (26)
- Financial reports (47)
- Investments (43)
- Market change (127)
- Mergers & Acquisitions (68)
- Mining Week (50)
Mining Business Blogs
Mining Houses
Advertisements