Archive

Posts Tagged ‘BHP’

Mining Week 42/’12: Bakrie vs. Bumi

October 13, 2012 Comments off

Top Stories of the Week:

  • Bakrie proposed to buy Bumi’s assets
    • The Bakrie Group, which owns approx. 24% of Bumi Plc, has an offer to buy Bumi plc’s assets (Berau and Bumi Resources) and leave the London listed miner active in Indonesia behind as a cash shell. The group previously held 48%, but sold 24% to Borneo Lumbung to ease debt issues.
    • Bumi’s share price has dropped 80% versus the high in July 2011 on the back of low coal prices and governance issues.
    • Sources: Financial Times 1; Financial Times 2; Wall Street Journal

    Bumi plc structure: London listed miner owns a stake in Berau coal and Bumi resources.

  • BHP Billiton seeks to cut costs

Trends & Implications:

  • Bakrie’s move to leave Bumi plc could imply the end of the Indonesian coal ambitions of Rothschild’s venture. If Bakrie finds the money to execute the deal, it offers other shareholders an opportunity to limit their losses. Bumi could try to reinvent itself and buy assets in other regions with the cash received for Bumi resources and Berau, but it would start with significantly less cash to acquire companies than in its attempt in 2011.
  • The updated M&A share attractiveness tracker shows a relative leveling of the playing field in terms of mega M&A over the past month. South African listed companies clearly took a major hit, but as the outlook for these companies deteriorated at the same time the shares have not gained much attractiveness from an acquisition standpoint. Fortescue managed to fend of urgent debt issues and saw its share price rise, but it remains one of the more attractive acquisition targets. BHP Billiton lost its position as the best positioned acquirer as outlook for the company deteriorates with the expectation of slowing global demand.(

2012 | Wilfred Visser | thebusinessofmining.com

Advertisements

BHP to Buy Chesapeake Shale Assets

February 23, 2011 Comments off

“BHP Billiton Ltd. said Monday it is acquiring Chesapeake Energy Corp.’s Fayetteville shale gas holdings in Arkansas and some pipeline assets in a deal totaling about $4.75 billion in cash.

Earlier this month, Chesapeake announced plans to sell about 487,000 acres of its Fayetteville shale holdings as part of a plan to reduce its debt by 25% in two years. The deal would increase BHP’s gas reserves and resources by 45%.

This acquisition would mark BHP’s first shale gas asset. The company, primarily a miner, gets about 20% of its profits from oil and gas. Most of its assets are in Australia, the Gulf of Mexico, Algeria and Pakistan. The Arkansas asset would likely supply natural gas mostly to utility companies.”

Source: Wall Street Journal, February 22 2011

Observations:

  • ExxonMobil started a run to acquire shale gas assets in December 2009 by paying $41bln for XTO Energy (incl. taking on $10bln debt). The deal was made contingent on the senate investigation into hydraulic fracturing; the method used to enhance production of gas from shale.
  • BHP pays $1.77/Mcf of proved gas reserves, about 30% below the price paid by ExxonMobil for XTO, but in line with recent other acquisitions in the industry.

Implications:

  • BHP can still expand in the oil and gas industry without triggering the regulatory roadblocks it faces when trying to expand its position in many mined commodities. It would therefore not be unlikely if it makes more acquisitions in the industry. Some analysts critique the diversification of the company, arguing that shareholders have little benefit from the combination of mining and oil/gas in one firm.
  • The natural hedge created by combining mining & oil/gas (benefiting from higher oil/gas prices on the sales side while being hurt at the same time in fuel and electricity prices) does enable the company to promise a steady cash flow to investors.

©2011 | Wilfred Visser | thebusinessofmining.com

%d bloggers like this: