Archive

Posts Tagged ‘Bumi’

Mining Week 4/’13: Caterpillar’s trouble & Bumi’s future

January 27, 2013 Comments off

Top Stories:

  • Caterpillar sees lower sales and fraud at Chinese acquisition
    • Caterpillar’s machinery sales declined 1% over the past 3 months, driven by poor results in AsiaPacific and North America.
    • The news of the mining slowdown hitting the top equipment manufacturer comes at the same time as the announcement of structural over reporting of profits at ERA Mining Machinery, the Chinese manufacturer bought for approx. $700m last year.
    • Sources: Caterpillar press release; Wall Street Journal; Financial Times
  • Bumi board favors Bakrie’s plans over Rothschild’s
    • The only two directors on Bumi’s board who Nathan Rothschild wanted to stay in function have sided with the rest of the board in the support for the plan to have the Bakrie family buy the Bumi Resources assets and separate from Bumi, which would be left with the Berau assets.
    • Rothschild and Bakrie have been in a dispute about the future of the London-listed miner with coal assets in Indonesia for several months. The company said this week that the decisions about the future structure of the group will not be impeded by the ongoing legal probe into financial practices at their assets.
    • Sources: Financial Times; Telegraph; Wall Street Journal

Trends & Implications:

  • The reduction of machinery sales at Caterpillar signals that the peak of new project development has passed. While miners raced to add capacity over the past years, many new projects are now put on hold or downsized. Although Caterpillar can expect to benefit from the forecasted rise increase of global resource requirements over the next decades, the fastest growth is over. Equipment manufacturers are a good indicator of overall growth outlook in the industry as their sales is directly linked to building of production capacity.
  • Bumi’s future appears to be that of an Asian-focused coal company without strong Indonesian shareholders. The tie-up of the Vallar cash shell with powerful Indonesian miners did create a significant player in the region, but the divergent views on corporate governance between the Indonesian and European-based owners has made it impossible to run the company effectively.

2013 | Wilfred Visser | thebusinessofmining.com

Mining Week 1/’13: Anglo and Mittal sell iron ore assets

January 6, 2013 Comments off

Top Stories:

  • Anglo and Cliffs sell 5Mtpa Brazilian iron ore mine
    • Anglo American and Cliffs Natural Resources sell their 70% and 30% stakes in the Northern Brazilian Amapa iron ore mine to private miner Zamin Ferrous for approx. $400m. A year after buying their 70% share 4 years ago, Anglo took a $1.5bn writedown on the asset.
    • Sources: Anglo American; Financial Times; Reuters
  • Bumi looses $422m in derivatives trading
    • Bumi Resources, partly owned by Bumi plc and part of the dispute between the Bakri family and Nath Rotschild about the future of Bumi, posted a loss over the first 9 months of 2012 driven by low coal prices and a loss of over $400m on derivatives.
    • The loss on derivatives value was driven by a re-calculation of early payment rights, changing the discount rate of the value of that option from 5.25% to 17.2%.
    • Sources: Bumi Resources results; Financial Times; Wall Street Journal
  • ArcelorMittal sells 15% stake of Labrador Trough for $1.1bn
    • Cash-hungry steel maker and miner ArcelorMittal decided to sell a 15% stake of its Labrador Trough iron ore project in Canada to Chinese steel maker Posco and Taiwanese steel maker China Steel, also signing long-term offtake agreements.
    • Sources: ArcelorMittal press release; Financial Times; The Hindu

Trends & Implications:

  • The sale of iron ore mines or stakes by ArcelorMittal and AngloAmerican signal 2 different trends in the industry:
    • The large miners are actively divesting non-core assets, trying to focus management attention and funding on the large operations and development projects.
    • Many companies are having trouble securing the funds required to execute the enormous development projects that are currently in execution phase in the iron ore industry. Forming partnerships and selling minority stakes is often the cheapest way to obtain funding.
  • The loss reported by Bumi Resouces is not a sign of mismanagement, but rather a sign of cleaning up the books and trying to make sure the assets listed are actually worth what they are listed for. Valuation of options is a highly subjective art, and the management of Bumi Resources apparently chose to take the revaluation hit at a moment when low coal prices were forces the results into the red anyway.

2013 | Wilfred Visser | thebusinessofmining.com

Mining Weekly 51/’12: Freeport, Xstrata, & Bumi

December 16, 2012 Comments off

Top Stories of December:

  • Freeport diversifies further into oil & gas
    • Copper miner Freeport McMoran surprised the market by acquiring two American oil & gas companies for approx. $9bn, taking on a lot of target debt to make a total deal size of approx. $20bn, the second largest acquisition in the industry this year.
    • Freeport did not request shareholder approval for the diversifying acquisitions, leaving a large part of the shareholder base unhappy with the deal and the stock price dropping approx. 15%.
    • Sources: Freeport presentation; Wall Street Journal; Financial Times
  • Xstrata puts Tampakan project on hold
    • Xstrata’s $5.9bn Tampakan copper project in the Philippines is put on hold while waiting for government approvals: the federal government doesn’t want to give the go ahead before the mining law is reformed, and the local government is opposing the issuance of an environmental permit based on a ban on open pit mining.
    • Sources: Reuters; Sagittarius / Xstrata
  • Bumi, Bakrie, and Rotschild continue their fight
    • The board of Bumi plc has indicated that it favors the Bakrie offer to buy out the assets of the Indonesian coal producer over Rothschilds offer to increase the stake in those assets. Bakrie’s offer implies that the shared ownership of assets by Bumi and Bakrie comes to an end.
    • The board also indicated that it does not intend to sell the stakes in Berau to Bakrie, which would mean the company does not completely revert to a cash shell.
    • Sources: Financial Times 1, 2; Jakarta Post

Trends & Implications:

  • Deloitte published its annual report with the top trends in the mining industry for the coming year: on top of the list is the continued high cost of doing business, which is forcing many companies to reconsider development projects (see Tampakan above). The full list of trends is:
      Deloitte - tracking the trends 2013

    • Counting the costs: Paying the price of bullish behavior
    • Managing demand uncertainty: Conflicting market indicators magnify volatility
    • Capital project deceleration: Quality trumps quantity in the project pipeline
    • Preparing for the M&A storm: Market indicators point to rising deal volumes
    • Governments eye the mining prize: Resource nationalism remains
    • Combating corruption: Miners are being held to higher standards
    • Climbing the social ladder: A new level of responsible behavior
    • Plugging the talent gap: Skills shortages still loom
    • Playing it safe: Using analytics to generate insights and improve safety outcomes
    • At the IT edge: Getting the most out of emerging – and existing – technologies
  • Xstrata’s decision to put the Tampakan project, one of the largest development projects in the copper industry, on hold fits two trends: the increasing importance of alignment with both federal and local governments in developing countries, especially around when governments and legislature are changing; and the hesitance to undertake any large investments in a time of rising costs and uncertainty around demand growth.

2012 | Wilfred Visser | thebusinessofmining.com

Check my latest column in the free online journal The International Resource Journal on the importance of iron ore derivatives.

Mining Week 45/’12: PotashCorp and Rothschild on the offensive

November 4, 2012 Comments off

Top Stories of the Week:

  • PotashCorp in talks to acquire ICL for $14bn
    • PotashCorp, the Canadian phosphate miner that was subject of a $39bn takeover attempt by BHP Billiton in 2010, is in talks with the Israeli government to acquire Israel Chemicals (ICL) and merge it with its own operations. PotashCorp already holds a 14% stake of ICL. The remaining share is worth roughly $14bn.
    • In an initial reaction the Israeli government, which holds a golden share in ICL’s mother company, indicated that the sale of ICL to PotashCorp would not be in the best interest of the country. In a later statement the government did indicate it would be open to a formal bid.
    • Sources: Wall Street Journal; BusinessWeek; Fox Business
  • Rothschild aims to increase Berau interest
    • In response to Bakrie’s proposal to buy out Bumi plc, Nathan Rothschild, the company’s founder, is said to look for partners to make a counterbid for Berau’s Indonesian coal assets.
    • Bumi Resources and Berau are the two key asset groups of Bumi plc, the result of a deal between Vallar plc and Bumi. Following falling call prices minority shareholder Bakrie has proposed a deal in which it would buy Bumi plc’s assets and thus separate Rothschilds and Bakrie’s interests.
    • Sources: Wall Street Journal; Financial Times; Bloomberg

Trends & Implications:

  • The Israeli response that selling ICL would not be in the country’s interest might be preliminary. Although 60% of ICL’s mining activity takes place in Israel, centered around the Dead See, it is unlikely that PotashCorp would want to tune down those activities. Only a very small part of ICL’s production is actually sold in Israel, and those products could be seen as global commodities, making it hard for the government to justify a case in which a sale would be rejected based on national security. The issue that PotashCorp and Israel will need to figure out is how much overhead jobs to leave in the country and/or how to compensate for the potential loss of jobs in office activity (similar to the negotiations undertaken by BHP Billiton with the Canadian government when trying to acquire PotashCorp).
  • Rothschild’s attempt to find new partners to continue his Indonesian activities with Berau does not seem te be a step that is in the interest of shareholders. Entering in a bidding contest with Bakrie for the assets it already controls is not going to improve the financial position of a company plagued by dropping commodity prices. If Bakrie actually manages to secure the funds required to execute the buy-out proposal it is likely that Rothschild will be able to find other, less politically sensitive, cheaper assets to work with. Whatever the result of this power struggle, it appears that Bakrie and Rothschild will not continue to own stakes of the same company.

2012 | Wilfred Visser | thebusinessofmining.com

Mining Week 42/’12: Bakrie vs. Bumi

October 13, 2012 Comments off

Top Stories of the Week:

  • Bakrie proposed to buy Bumi’s assets
    • The Bakrie Group, which owns approx. 24% of Bumi Plc, has an offer to buy Bumi plc’s assets (Berau and Bumi Resources) and leave the London listed miner active in Indonesia behind as a cash shell. The group previously held 48%, but sold 24% to Borneo Lumbung to ease debt issues.
    • Bumi’s share price has dropped 80% versus the high in July 2011 on the back of low coal prices and governance issues.
    • Sources: Financial Times 1; Financial Times 2; Wall Street Journal

    Bumi plc structure: London listed miner owns a stake in Berau coal and Bumi resources.

  • BHP Billiton seeks to cut costs

Trends & Implications:

  • Bakrie’s move to leave Bumi plc could imply the end of the Indonesian coal ambitions of Rothschild’s venture. If Bakrie finds the money to execute the deal, it offers other shareholders an opportunity to limit their losses. Bumi could try to reinvent itself and buy assets in other regions with the cash received for Bumi resources and Berau, but it would start with significantly less cash to acquire companies than in its attempt in 2011.
  • The updated M&A share attractiveness tracker shows a relative leveling of the playing field in terms of mega M&A over the past month. South African listed companies clearly took a major hit, but as the outlook for these companies deteriorated at the same time the shares have not gained much attractiveness from an acquisition standpoint. Fortescue managed to fend of urgent debt issues and saw its share price rise, but it remains one of the more attractive acquisition targets. BHP Billiton lost its position as the best positioned acquirer as outlook for the company deteriorates with the expectation of slowing global demand.(

2012 | Wilfred Visser | thebusinessofmining.com

Mining Week 07/’12: Results time and the Bumi story

February 19, 2012 Comments off

Top Stories of the Week:

  • Friction between Bumi board and Rothschild
    • Conflict arose in the board of Bumi, the Indonesian coal miner with the investor Nathan Rothschild as a large investor after a reverse takeover of the Vallar investment vehicle. After initial conflicts the Indonesian board members planned to remove mr. Rothschild from the board, but he now only appears to have to give up his co-chairmanship. Share price of the company dropped significantly after the news of the conflict.
    • Sources: Financial Times; Wall Street Journal; Bumi’s overview of board members
  • Annual results published without major surprises
    • (Higher prices + higher costs) x lower volumes = lower profits. That was the story of the results releases of the world’s largest miners this week. The impairment taken by Rio Tinto on the Alcan acquisition costs probably was the most significant item, together with the relatively positive outlook given after the negative and uncertain signals given about global demand in the past months.
    • Sources: Rio Tinto results presentation; text; Wall Street Journal on Anglo
  • BHP (58%) and Rio (30%) expand Escondida at $4.5bln cost
    • BHP Billiton and Rio Tinto announced investments of $4.5bln to replace the plant at Escondida, the world’s largest copper mine in output, increasing capacity and enabling mining restricted by the current facilities.
    • Sources: BHP Billiton news release; Rio Tinto media release; Reuters

Trends & Implications:

  • February is the month in which most of the world’s largest diversified miners present their annual results (only BHP Billiton runs a different fiscal year). The investor presentations provide interesting reading and give a good idea of the vision for the future of the industry. Below a peak preview with the most insightful slides from the presentations:

©2012 | Wilfred Visser | thebusinessofmining.com

Mining Week 43/’11: Uncertainty in Indonesia

October 23, 2011 Comments off

Top Stories of the Week:

  • Freeport McMoran faces strikes in Indonesia
    • About half of the workers at Freeports’ Grasberg mine went on strike to demand higher pay, forcing the company to shut down operations. Several strikers have been killed by police and unknown gunmen in the past week.
    • Sources: FCX press release; Financial Times; Wall Street Journal
  • Rio Tinto sells aluminium, buys uranium
  • BHP shops for iron ore in Brazil
    • Junior miner Ferrous Resources, worth just over $3bln, is looking for a buyer. BHP Billiton and a Chinese company are talking with management to negotiate a price.
    • Sources: Financial Times; Fox Business

Trends & Implications:

  • Freeport’s social troubles in Indonesia are the latest labor issue in a rise of labor unrest in the latest year after years of relatively peace in the industry. The unrest mainly affects copper producers, which have seen profits rise with high copper prices, but did not want to increase worker’s compensation too much to secure long term competitiveness.
  • The large diversified miners are increasingly focusing their attention on a limited number of extremely large operations, divesting smaller operations. With the spending power of the ‘mining supermajors’ a divide seems to open between the few operators of the world’s key supply areas and the many operators of a range of smaller operations.
  • Rio Tinto might face challenges selling the unwanted aluminium assets in one package. Very few companies are able to do acquisitions worth over $7bln, and many of the companies that have the spending power might face antitrust limitations.

©2011 | Wilfred Visser | thebusinessofmining.com

Anglo American eyes Macarthur coal

August 23, 2011 Comments off

“Anglo American is considering a counterbid for Macarthur Coal in an attempt to gatecrash a A$4.7bn (US$4.9bn) bid for the Australian coal group from Peabody Energy and ArcelorMittal. Earlier this month, Macarthur said it was open to offers that valued its business at nearly A$5bn after formally rejecting an ‘opportunistic’ bid from Peabody Energy of the US and steelmaker ArcelorMittal.
People familiar with the bid process said there were a number of interested parties, one of which was Anglo American. The mining group is said to be working with its traditional advisers, which include Goldman Sachs.
It is not clear whether Anglo will proceed with any offer, and talks are expected to come to a head in the next week. A deal would be the largest by Anglo since 2007, with its recent blooming profits creating a degree of financial flexibility that the company has not enjoyed for several years.”

Source: Financial Times, August 21 2011

Observations:

  • Peabody and ArcelorMittal have made an offer to the shareholders of Macarthur after Macarthur’s board declined to agree to the offer and not search for higher bidders.
  • Anglo’s metallurgical coal operations are currently mainly located in Queensland, giving a good geographical match with Macarthur’s operations.

Implications:

  • The current stake of ArcelorMittal in Macarthur will be an important hinderance for other parties to make a counterbid. If their bid would succeed, they would still be left with ArcelorMittal as an important party in the board room.
  • Potential other parties interested in buying Macarthur could be Chinese steel makers and/or coal miners, other large coal producers in Australia (Rio Tinto, BMA), government backed Indian coal miners, or even Vallar/Bumi. Based on the proximity to existing operations Anglo would be able to justify a higher premium than new entrants in the Queensland coal industry.

©2011 | Wilfred Visser | thebusinessofmining.com

Indonesia’s Indika to Expand Coal-Mining Capacity

June 15, 2011 Comments off

“Coal miner PT Indika Energy will expand capacity at least 25% in the next three years to meet the growing demand for fuel in expanding Asian economies, the company’s chief executive said. Indika plans to boost the capacity of the mines it controls through PT Kideco Jaya Angung to 50 million metric tons in the next two to three years from 40 million tons, said Arsjad Rasjid, Indika’s CEO and president director. The company hopes to lift capacity at least in part through acquisition.

The Jakarta-based company, which had revenue of around $440 million last year, is seeking to keep up with rising demand for thermal coal to fuel the power plants of India, China and in Indonesia. Indika is Indonesia’s third-largest coal miner, behind PT Adaro Energy and PT Bumi Resources.”

Source: Wall Street Journal, June 14 2011

Observations:

  • Indonesia is located close to China and India, both of which depend on thermal coal imports. At the same time the economic development in Indonesia (with over 240 million inhabitants) is driving the domestic demand. As a result the coal mining sector in the country is recently getting strong international attention.
  • The Indonesian coal mining industry was strongly reshuffled last year after Vallar combined the assets of domestic champions Bakrie and Bumi. Part of the this deal, which results in a FTSE-listed Bumi plc., is executed this week by Vallar issuing convertible bonds to Bumi resources.
  • Coal India is also looking to invest in Indonesian coal mines, using part of the funds raised through last year’s IPO, which had the company enter the global mining top 10 in terms of market capitalization.

Implications:

  • Indonesian coal reserves are rather small compared to Chinese and Indian reserves. With the strong rise of domestic demand it is foreseen that Indonesian exports are not going to be much higher than current levels. However, as most of the reserves are located on the island Kalimantan and demand is mainly on Java and Sumatra export facilities will be built anyway, linking the Indonesian market to the global seaborne coal market.
  • Indonesian government is trying to find a balance in regulating production and exports, looking at the conflicting perspectives of energy requirements for own development and income from coal exports. High export tariffs and/or production caps could possibly hurt the international investors.

©2011 | Wilfred Visser | thebusinessofmining.com

Coal India in Talks to Buy Stake in Indonesian Mines

May 27, 2011 Comments off

“Coal India, the world’s largest coal producer, may submit a final bid by the end of June to buy a stake in Indonesia’s PT Golden Energy Mines, a person with direct knowledge of the matter said. The state-run coal monopoly is currently doing due diligence of Golden Energy, said the person who declined to be named. Coal India brought out its initial public offer last year. ‘It is not a controlling stake,’ the person said, and didn’t provide more details. He said Coal India is yet to decide on a valuation for the stake it plans to purchase as a proposal is yet to be placed before the company’s board. ‘There are various proposals in countries like Indonesia, Australia, U.S., which Coal India keeps on evaluating,’ the person said.

Coal India, which contributes to more than 80% of the country’s coal needs, faces several obstacles in augmenting its output such as delays in environment clearances. To meet rising demand from consumers, mainly in the power sector, the company has been scouting for mining assets overseas. More than half of India’s power-generation capacity of 174.36 gigawatts is based on thermal coal. The country aims to add 163 GW of capacity in the decade through March 2017 and a major portion of the new capacity would also be dependent on fossil fuel. India, the world’s second-fastest growing economy in the world, faces shortage of coal as environmental concerns have delayed approvals for local mining, hurting production. The country is facing a shortage of 142 million tons of coal for the current year. Local production of coal is expected to be 554 million tons against demand for 696 million tons, according to government estimates.”

Source: Wall Street Journal, May 26 2011

Observations:

  • The rumors about a potential acquisition by Coal India were spread around the time of announcement of quarterly results. The company posted net income for the quarter of over $900mln.
  • A small part of the company was sold in an IPO last year, providing several billions of dollars to be used in overseas acquisitions and domestic expansion to fuel Indian demand for thermal coal. The government projects a shortfall over the next year of approx. 140mln tons, roughly a third of the total Coal India production for the year.

Implications:

  • Stepping up mine production in India is mainly hindered by slow environmental permitting processes. Part of the problem lies with the government’s inefficiency in running the permitting process, the other part of the problem lies with Coal India and other miners in the country that have not yet adapted to the increasing stringency of regulation.
  • Indonesia is growing into an important coal supplier to both India and China. The acquisition of Vallar of a series of assets and participations to form Bumi plc is just one example of the rising importance of the country. However, just as in India the environmental and social regulations in Indonesia are being strengthened, which might slow down the development of coal production in the country.

©2011 | Wilfred Visser | thebusinessofmining.com