Posts Tagged ‘Posco’
January 6, 2013 Comments off
- Anglo and Cliffs sell 5Mtpa Brazilian iron ore mine
- Anglo American and Cliffs Natural Resources sell their 70% and 30% stakes in the Northern Brazilian Amapa iron ore mine to private miner Zamin Ferrous for approx. $400m. A year after buying their 70% share 4 years ago, Anglo took a $1.5bn writedown on the asset.
- Sources: Anglo American; Financial Times; Reuters
- Bumi looses $422m in derivatives trading
- Bumi Resources, partly owned by Bumi plc and part of the dispute between the Bakri family and Nath Rotschild about the future of Bumi, posted a loss over the first 9 months of 2012 driven by low coal prices and a loss of over $400m on derivatives.
- The loss on derivatives value was driven by a re-calculation of early payment rights, changing the discount rate of the value of that option from 5.25% to 17.2%.
- Sources: Bumi Resources results; Financial Times; Wall Street Journal
- ArcelorMittal sells 15% stake of Labrador Trough for $1.1bn
- Cash-hungry steel maker and miner ArcelorMittal decided to sell a 15% stake of its Labrador Trough iron ore project in Canada to Chinese steel maker Posco and Taiwanese steel maker China Steel, also signing long-term offtake agreements.
- Sources: ArcelorMittal press release; Financial Times; The Hindu
Trends & Implications:
- The sale of iron ore mines or stakes by ArcelorMittal and AngloAmerican signal 2 different trends in the industry:
- The large miners are actively divesting non-core assets, trying to focus management attention and funding on the large operations and development projects.
- Many companies are having trouble securing the funds required to execute the enormous development projects that are currently in execution phase in the iron ore industry. Forming partnerships and selling minority stakes is often the cheapest way to obtain funding.
- The loss reported by Bumi Resouces is not a sign of mismanagement, but rather a sign of cleaning up the books and trying to make sure the assets listed are actually worth what they are listed for. Valuation of options is a highly subjective art, and the management of Bumi Resources apparently chose to take the revaluation hit at a moment when low coal prices were forces the results into the red anyway.
2013 | Wilfred Visser | thebusinessofmining.com
July 29, 2012 Comments off
Top Stories of the Week:
- Vale’s profits down on lower prices
- Vale reported profits below analyst estimates and 60% down versus the same quarter last year. The benchmark price of iron ore has dropped to $120/wmt, at part with the price floor identified by the company last quarter.
- After the first quarter Vale reported a 45% drop in year on year profits, driven by both volumes and prices
- Sources: Vale press release; Financial Times
- Anglo, Teck, Gold miners down on lower prices
- Lower commodity prices and rising costs resulted in earnings drops of 55%, 65%, and 35% for Anglo, Teck, and Barrick.
- Anglo announced delay of its flagship development iron ore project in Brazil, Barrick announced large cost overruns for its Pascua Lama project in Argentina, and Teck recently tuned back on a large copper expansion project in Chile. They are all reviewing the balance between project investments and shareholder returns.
- Sources: FT on Anglo; FT on Teck; WSJ on Barrick
- Anglo pays $0.6bn for controlling stake in Mozambique coking coal project
- In a rare move amidst cancellation of development projects across the industry Anglo made the move to buy 59% of the 1.4Bt Revuboe coal project in Mozambique. The project is a JV with Nippon and Posco and is planning to start production of 6-9Mtpa by September 2013.
- Sources: Financial Times; Anglo press release
Trends & Implications:
- Dropping prices + increasing costs = review of development. Most non-agricultural commodity price indices have dropped 20-40% over the past year. Where a year ago the focus of most miners was to bring new projects online as fast as possible, attention has shifted to cost containment and ‘disciplined capital investment’. The focus on building projects is stretching capacity of contractors, making capital and operating costs increase rapidly. As a result the projected returns of projects deteriorate, forcing companies to reconsider their portfolio of development plans.
©2012 | Wilfred Visser | thebusinessofmining.com