Archive

Posts Tagged ‘profit’

Mining Week 33/’12: Coal, copper, iron ore profit drops

August 13, 2012 Comments off

Top Stories of the Week:

  • Harry Winston chooses between BHP’s and Rio’s diamond business
    • Harry Winston, the diamond retailer that holds a 40% stake in Rio Tinto’s Diavik mine in Northern Canada, is in talks with BHP Billiton to buy the Ekati operation, also in the north of Canada. Both Rio Tinto and BHP are trying to get out of the diamond business as they can’t realize the scale in the industry to make it a core business.
    • Titan, part of the Tata group, is rumoured to be interested in an acquisition of Harry Winston and might emerge as a competitor in the consolidation movement in the diamond business with strong financial backing.
    • Sources: Wall Street Journal; Financial Times
  • Xstrata’s profit drops on prices and volumes
    • Xstrata’s operating profit for the first half year dropped by 42%. Approx. half of the drop is attributed to lower commodity prices, the other half mainly to inflation and lower volumes.
    • An important message communicated in Xstrata’s earnings presentation is the potential of the company to continue stand-alone in case the share acquisition by Glencore (supported by Xstrata management) fails. Xstrata’s shareholders get to vote on the deal on September 7th.
    • Sources: Financial Times 1; Financial Times 1; Xstrata presentation
  • Rio Tinto profits down on lower coal and iron ore prices

Trends & Implications:

  • Xstrata is among the few companies that manages to communicate (or achieve) a unit cost reduction in its earnings presentation, probably the largest driver of positive reception of the quarterly numbers by the investment community. By breaking out the ‘uncontrollable’ inflation part the company communicates it has success in cost cutting, even though nominal costs increased year on year.
  • Most large miners are stressing the discipline of their capital investments in the latest presentations they are giving, promising only to invest if a good return can be achieved. The most prominent example of a potential cutback on capital expenditure is BHP’s announcement that it is reviewing the expansion of the outer harbour in Western Australia required to lift iron ore export capacity to the planned level. While trying hard to show the investments are responsible, the companies also try to communicate that ‘the industry fundamentals’ are still solid, mainly using the projected long-term growth of China as explanation. However, Rio Tinto’s updated demand forecast graphs are among the first that show a negative Chinese trend after 2030 (in line with the model presented on this site). Knowing that a large part of current big projects in iron ore and coal are planned to build capacity for more than 20 years these long-term prospects slowly start to make their way into investment decision-making.

©2012 | Wilfred Visser | thebusinessofmining.com

Mining Week 31/’12: Falling prices, falling profits

July 29, 2012 Comments off

Top Stories of the Week:

  • Vale’s profits down on lower prices
    • Vale reported profits below analyst estimates and 60% down versus the same quarter last year. The benchmark price of iron ore has dropped to $120/wmt, at part with the price floor identified by the company last quarter.
    • After the first quarter Vale reported a 45% drop in year on year profits, driven by both volumes and prices
    • Sources: Vale press release; Financial Times
  • Anglo, Teck, Gold miners down on lower prices
    • Lower commodity prices and rising costs resulted in earnings drops of 55%, 65%, and 35% for Anglo, Teck, and Barrick.
    • Anglo announced delay of its flagship development iron ore project in Brazil, Barrick announced large cost overruns for its Pascua Lama project in Argentina, and Teck recently tuned back on a large copper expansion project in Chile. They are all reviewing the balance between project investments and shareholder returns.
    • Sources: FT on Anglo; FT on Teck; WSJ on Barrick
  • Anglo pays $0.6bn for controlling stake in Mozambique coking coal project
    • In a rare move amidst cancellation of development projects across the industry Anglo made the move to buy 59% of the 1.4Bt Revuboe coal project in Mozambique. The project is a JV with Nippon and Posco and is planning to start production of 6-9Mtpa by September 2013.
    • Sources: Financial Times; Anglo press release

Trends & Implications:

  • Dropping prices + increasing costs = review of development. Most non-agricultural commodity price indices have dropped 20-40% over the past year. Where a year ago the focus of most miners was to bring new projects online as fast as possible, attention has shifted to cost containment and ‘disciplined capital investment’. The focus on building projects is stretching capacity of contractors, making capital and operating costs increase rapidly. As a result the projected returns of projects deteriorate, forcing companies to reconsider their portfolio of development plans.

©2012 | Wilfred Visser | thebusinessofmining.com

Mining Week 09/’12: Focus back to operational challenges

March 4, 2012 1 comment

Top Stories of the Week:

  • Rio Tinto invests over $0.5bln on driverless trains
    • Rio Tinto announced a large investment in its ‘Mine of the Future’ program to make the first of its approx. 150 trains on the Pilbara iron ore network driverless by 2014. The program will cost the company over $500mln, though it remains unclear what part of that amount is ‘research’ and what part is plain ‘hardware’.
    • Sources: Rio Tinto press release; Financial Times; Sydney Morning Herald on union reaction
  • Kazakhmys sees costs rise faster than revenues
    • Kazakhmys, the Kazakh copper miner, posted flat profits as growth was offset by cost increase of over 20%, mainly due to skyrocketing labour costs in the country’s resource market. The company also made bullish statements about growth of the copper demand in China.
    • Sources: Company overview; Financial Times; Reuters

Trends & Implications:

  • Driverless trains are only one step in the larger automation effort for which Rio Tinto is the technology leader. Other areas of research are improving exploration performance and increasing recovery, especially from underground mines. A lot of the automation work focuses on the iron ore operations in Northern Australia. These operations have the scale to enable large savings by automation, and they struggle continuously with finding sufficient skilled employees at acceptable costs.
  • Whether or not Rio Tinto’s role as the ‘technology leader‘ is a smart strategy is debatable: one might argue that begin a ‘smart follower‘, and thus not paying for the disappointments any large-scale research program holds, is more cost-effective. However, Rio Tinto has taken the approach that any research that can pay for itself in the long term is worth doing. Clearly the company will try to protect its findings as much as possible, but other companies will certainly start using its innovations in some way, reducing demand for skilled labor in remote positions and improving recovery potential.

©2012 | Wilfred Visser | thebusinessofmining.com

Mining Week 07/’12: Results time and the Bumi story

February 19, 2012 Comments off

Top Stories of the Week:

  • Friction between Bumi board and Rothschild
    • Conflict arose in the board of Bumi, the Indonesian coal miner with the investor Nathan Rothschild as a large investor after a reverse takeover of the Vallar investment vehicle. After initial conflicts the Indonesian board members planned to remove mr. Rothschild from the board, but he now only appears to have to give up his co-chairmanship. Share price of the company dropped significantly after the news of the conflict.
    • Sources: Financial Times; Wall Street Journal; Bumi’s overview of board members
  • Annual results published without major surprises
    • (Higher prices + higher costs) x lower volumes = lower profits. That was the story of the results releases of the world’s largest miners this week. The impairment taken by Rio Tinto on the Alcan acquisition costs probably was the most significant item, together with the relatively positive outlook given after the negative and uncertain signals given about global demand in the past months.
    • Sources: Rio Tinto results presentation; text; Wall Street Journal on Anglo
  • BHP (58%) and Rio (30%) expand Escondida at $4.5bln cost
    • BHP Billiton and Rio Tinto announced investments of $4.5bln to replace the plant at Escondida, the world’s largest copper mine in output, increasing capacity and enabling mining restricted by the current facilities.
    • Sources: BHP Billiton news release; Rio Tinto media release; Reuters

Trends & Implications:

  • February is the month in which most of the world’s largest diversified miners present their annual results (only BHP Billiton runs a different fiscal year). The investor presentations provide interesting reading and give a good idea of the vision for the future of the industry. Below a peak preview with the most insightful slides from the presentations:

©2012 | Wilfred Visser | thebusinessofmining.com

Exchange rates weigh on Rio Tinto profits

August 12, 2011 Comments off

“Rio Tinto’s iron-ore-driven profits set company records for the interim period but shares fell for a fourth day as investors’ flight from equities hits resources stocks hardest.

Tom Albanese, chief executive of the mining company, commented on the widening gap between miners’ rising earnings momentum and falling share prices. ‘There is a distorted set of economic drivers associated with the current uncertainties with respect to us and the European debt markets,’ he told the Financial Times. ‘You have an exaggerated diversion of ‘risk on’ to ‘risk off’ trades. It is difficult to come to any conclusions, but this is a backdrop that could persist for some time.’

… sector-wide pressures of rising costs and adverse exchange rates weighed on Rio’s profitability, contributing to earnings that missed consensus expectations. Higher costs for energy, materials and equipment lowered Rio’s underlying earnings by $479m, and exchange rates between the weak US dollar and strong Australian and Canadian dollars – currencies in which it incurs costs – reduced them by a further $810m in the first half.”

Source: Financial Times, August 4 2011

Observations:

  • Total increase of earnings because of price increases ($5bln) was offset by almost $3bln lower earnings because of volumes, costs and exchange rates.
  • Just as Anglo American, the company gives a detailed explanation of the rising costs, providing rare details on the waiting times for various types of equipment (see outlook – page 8). The outlook shows the average delivery time for equipment currently is approx. 6-9 months higher than average.
  • The impact of lost volumes because of weather impact (hurricanes & floods) in the first half of the year, often mentioned as important driver of prices, is only $245mln.

Implications:

  • Rio Tinto does not appear to be concerned with the current importance of iron ore as the driver of earnings. The company regards construction industry growth in China the most important metric for the economic outlook and mentions expansion of production capacity of Western Australian iron ore mines as key development priority. The company joins competitor Vale in this single-minded focus, while BHP Billiton appears to be more committed to diversify, as signalled by its acquisitions in the shale gas industry.
  • The presented $26bln capex package does not yet include projects in advanced feasibility stage such as Simandou (iron ore in Guinea). The relatively conservative dividend and buy-back program does leave room for very aggressive development spending and helps the company to keep a very low gearing. So far all major miners choose to keep the gearing low despite their positive commodities market forecasts.

©2011 | Wilfred Visser | thebusinessofmining.com

Chilean Copper-Mine Strike Continues

July 28, 2011 Comments off

“Escondida, the world’s largest copper mine, declined the Chilean government’s offer of mediation in its labor conflict, Valor Futuro reported Tuesday, citing a company document. The sole union at the mine, representing 2,375 workers, went on strike late Thursday to protest what it says are unmet labor-contract terms.

‘We’ve received an invitation from the government to talk, and in this context we’ve given them our reasons for declining to participate at a negotiations table with union leaders while the illegal strike continues,’ reads the Escondida document as reported by Valor Futuro.”

Source: Wall Street Journal, July 26 2011

Observations:

  • Escondida (translated: ‘hidden’) is majority owned and operated by BHP Billiton. Unions demand higher bonuses, unmet housing benefits, the elimination of shifts lasting more than 12 hours, and protection for sick workers.
  • Daily lost output could add up to 3,000 tons. The company plays tough by refusing to continue negotiations as long as the strikes continue.

Implications:

  • The wave of new labor contracts reached for various copper mines in Chile through collective bargaining has gone relatively smooth so far. Leaders of Codelco have expressed fear that the conflict at Escondida could spread to other companies.
  • High commodity prices and increased resource nationalism have led to a surge in mine operation strikes in the last months: BHP’s Australian coal operations, South African coal mines, and Escondida being the most well-known. Companies try to maximize output and make record profits while prices are high, and in turn workers demand a larger part of this profit then originally agreed upon.

©2011 | Wilfred Visser | thebusinessofmining.com

BHP’s Iron Ore Output Rises, But Coal Hit By Rain

July 22, 2011 Comments off

“BHP Billiton Ltd. has paved the way for another year of strong earnings after record production of several commodities including iron ore, although output of metallurgical coal, which is also used to produce steel, continues to be held sharply back by earlier flooding in northeastern Australia.

BHP said Wednesday it achieved an 11th consecutive production record for iron ore, with output up 8% in the year through June 30 at 134.4 million metric tons and 14% higher than a year before in the final quarter. The company shipped ore from its operations in Western Australia state at an annualized rate of 155 million tons a year in the fiscal fourth quarter, it said.

However, metallurgical coal output was 13% lower for the year at 32.7 million tons. BHP said it continues to expect production and sales will be impacted “to some extent” over the remainder of the calendar year by the monsoon rains and flooding that swept Queensland in late 2010 and early this year. Output showed a recovery in the June quarter, up 19% on the prior quarter but down 28% on record volumes in the same quarter last year.”

Source: Wall Street Journal, July 20 2011

Observations:

  • Production for quarter compared to same quarter last year for BHP Billiton and Rio Tinto:
    • iron ore: BHP +14%; Rio +12%
    • metallurgical coal: BHP -28%; Rio -26%
    • thermal coal: BHP +13%; Rio +5%
    • copper: BHP -6%; Rio -17%
  • Credit Suisse expects full year net profit of $23bln for the company. Consensus revenue estimate is around $73bln. This would lift profit margin above 30%; even high than pre-crisis records.

Historic BHP Billiton Revenue and Profit (source: finance.google.com)

Implications:

  • Last year’s production disruptions caused by weather were very severe, but still the large miners manage to achieve record profits. Though double digit year-on-year growth of production for key products is impressive, it will be very hard to retain this growth rate. The miners are certainly not short of cash, but are running out of the large, low cost, development opportunities they are aiming for.
  • The tone of voice of headlines for news on the production reports of BHP and Rio Tinto is striking. While number presented above show that overall results are very similar, the focus of headlines for BHP is on ‘robustness and higher iron ore output’, while Rio Tinto’s results are welcomed as ‘output declines’.

©2011 | Wilfred Visser | thebusinessofmining.com

Rusal Net Profit More Than Triples

April 1, 2011 Comments off

“United Co. Rusal PLC said Thursday its net profit more than tripled last year on higher aluminum prices and a strong contribution from 25%-owned OAO Norilsk Nickel. The Russian aluminum giant plans to nearly double capital spending this year to boost capacity in the face of growing aluminum demand.

Rusal CEO Oleg Deripaska said in a statement the company’s strong net-profit growth was driven by significant increases in demand for aluminum and metal prices, and the company expects global demand for aluminium to grow 8% to 43.8 million metric tons this year. He also said aluminum prices will likely remain in a range of $2,500-$2,600 per ton until the end of the year, due to underlying demand and continuing weakness in the U.S. dollar. Prices were volatile last year, ranging from less than $2,000 per ton to as high as $2,500 per ton, he said.”

Source: Wall Street Journal, March 31 2011

Observations:

  • The largest part of annual profit ($2.44bln out of $2.87bln) comes from the share in Norilsk Nickel, a low-cost nickel producer.
  • Bauxite output of the company increased 4% to 11.8mln tons. Rusal operates 8 mines in Guinea and Guyana.

Implications:

  • Cost increase in both alumina and electricity has driven the industry’s break-even price to above $2,200/ton. Predicted demand increases faster than supply, potentially leading to further price increases. However, large trading stocks could supplement supply and keep the price relatively low for several years.
  • Increasing demand partly comes from copper substitution. Rusal benefits in the long term from the high copper price as manufacturers search for alternatives to copper wires.

©2011 | Wilfred Visser | thebusinessofmining.com

Vale reports record full year financials

February 28, 2011 Comments off

“Vale, the world’s largest iron ore miner, reported record net profit for last year as demand remained strong in China and nickel volumes recovered. The company on Thursday said it earned net profit of $17.26bn in 2010, more than three times what it made a year earlier, as sales reached $46.48bn, nearly double the $23.94bn of revenue in 2009.

Asia accounted for more than 53 per cent of operating revenue, with China contributing more than 33 per cent and Japan 11 per cent.”

Source: Financial Times, February 25 2011

Observations:

  • Revenue for 2010 is 21% higher than the previous record of 2008. EBIT, EBITDA and Net Earnings are up over 30% since 2008 as the EBITDA margin increased by 6%, mainly driven by higher iron ore prices. Earnings per Share of $3.25 are on the top side of analyst expectations.
  • The company is working on iron ore expansion projects in Carajás (Northern Brazil) and the new Simandou deposit in Guinea. Apolo (Brazil’s Southeast system) and Carajás Serra Sul are further down the line of expanding production, planned to be delivered in 2014. Ferrous minerals accounted for 92% of adjusted EBIT over 2010, showing the company’s large dependence on iron ore prices.
  • Expansion for non-ferrous commodities mainly takes place outside Brazil: Mozambique’s Moatize coal project; Zambia’s Konkola North copper project; Argentina’s Rio Colorado fertilizer project; and Peru’s Bayovar fertilizer expansion signify the increasing international presence of the company.

Implications:

  • The improved gross margin of the company does not indicate it has costs under control, but mainly that prices were higher. Vale did not suffer from exchange rate fluctuations as much as its peers as most of its costs are incurred in currencies linked to the dollar, but it mentions cost pressures in the areas of depreciation (resulting from expansion of the equipment fleet) and in procurement.
  • Cash position of $10bln at the end of 2010 and the outlook to beat last year’s cash flow from operations of $20bln in 2011 gives Agnelli a lot of flexibility in expanding. Vale will have to use the pile of cash to build a sustainable position among the supermajors even if iron ore prices come down. As the senior management indicates no major acquisitions will be done, the company will focus on organic growth (33 projects to be delivered by 2015) to achieve this objective.
  • When presenting the results no mention was made of election of a new CEO for Vale. Reelection of Roger Agnelli when his current term ends in March is not fully certain as tensions with the government are mentioned. Henrique Meirelles, Brazil’s former central bank governor, and base metals chief Tito Botelho Martins would be potential candidates to succeed him. The decision will have to be made by the powers behind Vale: the Brazilian government, Pension fund Previ and Banco Bradesco, and Mitsui.

©2011 | Wilfred Visser | thebusinessofmining.com

Vedanta delivers strong results, but faces operational challenges

November 12, 2010 Comments off

“The company reported revenues of US$4.6 billion and an EBITDA of US$1.3 billion in the first
half of this year due to higher volumes and realisations across all operations as compared with
the corresponding prior period. Operating profit was US$985 million and attributable profit
was US$337 million, a 39.4% share of net income.

US$479 million of free cash flow was generated after investing c. $1.1 billion in growth capex.
Net debt and gearing were $1.6 billion and 11.6% respectively. Gearing is expected to be less
than 40% after completion of the Cairn India acquisition, and is expected to reduce quickly
given the inherent cash generation of the group.”

Source: Vedanta Interim Results Presentation, November 11 2010

Performance:

  • Vedanta, the major Indian diversified mining company (although run from London), posted record profits, mainly driven by increases of zinc and iron ore prices. EBITDA margin of around 40% is lower than for some international competitors, but reflects the broad base of small mines the company owns in India.
  • The company is well positioned to be the supplier of choice for the rapidly growing Indian industry. The extension of its business into oil & gas and utilities helps the group to be rather self-sufficient, making it less dependent from poor national infrastructure than international competitors trying to enter the country

Challenges:

  • Upon analysis of the increase of EBITDA the results are not as strong as initially expected. The increase is fully explained by increase of commodity prices (see figure below). Volumes only increased a little bit, completely driven by iron ore volumes. In terms of cash costs, royalties and other comparable items the performance in the 1st half of fiscal year 2011 was actually worse than in the 1st half of fiscal year 2010.
  • The EBITDA breakdown is partly explained by the challenges the company is facing to comply with the rapid changes in regulatory environment in India. The company is struggling to get new assets up to speed as litigation for environmental and ethical/legal issues is forcing it into defensive positions. Apart from the iron ore operations, the low productivity in its mines does not seem to improve.

©2010 | Wilfred Visser | thebusinessofmining.com